Charities and non-profits
Which scenario reads a charity's transfers to places and partners its stated purpose does not explain?
A scenario that places here
example"Charity accounts sending funds to conflict regions"
Channels it applies to
2 of the 20 in the dictionaryACH WIN
ACH and direct entry and international wires: one sector each on the coverage chart, hatched where no scenario reaches it.
Reference lines
held figures- BSA BSA-REC-1 names $3,000 for funds-transfer records on domestic wires, international wires, correspondent accounts and remittance and money transfer. A scenario of this typology starting above it is flagged "above the reporting threshold".
- FATF R.16 INR16.8 names USD or EUR 1,000 for the cross-border de minimis threshold a country may set on international wires and remittance and money transfer. A scenario of this typology starting above it is flagged "above the reporting threshold".
Obligations
3 regimes| Regime | Obligation |
|---|---|
| Bank Secrecy Act and its regulations (31 CFR Chapter X) | BSA BSA-AML-15 Transaction Monitoring |
| FATF 40 Recommendations | FATF R.10 Customer due diligence · FATF R.8 Non-profit organisations |
| Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act (Australia) | AUSTRAC AMLCTF-PartA-TxnMon Transaction Monitoring |
The obligations, quoted
BSA BSA-AML-15 Transaction MonitoringAutomated and manual transaction monitoring shall identify unusual or suspicious activity using risk-based scenarios and thresholds.
Where programmes usually fall short: No model validation; Scenarios not aligned to risk assessment
Source: Bank Secrecy Act and its regulations (31 CFR Chapter X)
FATF R.10 Customer due diligenceFinancial institutions may not keep anonymous accounts or accounts in obviously fictitious names and must, by a principle set out in law, undertake customer due diligence when establishing a business relationship, carrying out an occasional transaction above USD or EUR 15,000 or a payment or value transfer covered by INR.16, when money laundering or terrorist financing is suspected, or when they doubt previously obtained identification data: identify and verify the customer from reliable independent sources; identify the beneficial owner and take reasonable measures to verify that identity, understanding the ownership and control structure of legal persons and arrangements; understand and where appropriate obtain information on the purpose and intended nature of the relationship; and conduct ongoing due diligence and transaction scrutiny consistent with the customer's profile including, where necessary, the source of funds. The extent of each measure follows a risk-based approach; verification takes place before or during establishment of the relationship, or as soon as reasonably practicable after it where risks are managed and business would otherwise be interrupted; an institution that cannot complete CDD does not open the account or perform the transaction, or terminates the relationship, and considers a suspicious transaction report; the requirements apply to new customers and, on materiality and risk, to existing ones. The Interpretive Note sets the risk-based approach, enhanced and simplified measures, the specific measures for legal persons, arrangements and beneficiaries of life insurance, reliance on prior verification and the timing rules.
Where programmes usually fall short: Beneficial owner identified but never verified; Ownership and control structure of corporate customers not understood
Source: FATF 40 Recommendations
FATF R.8 Non-profit organisationsCountries identify the organisations that fall within the FATF definition of non-profit organisations, assess their terrorist financing risks, and apply focused, proportionate and risk-based measures that protect them from abuse by terrorist organisations posing as legitimate entities, as conduits for terrorist financing including to escape asset freezing, and through concealed diversion of funds intended for legitimate purposes, without unduly disrupting or discouraging legitimate NPO activity; the Interpretive Note covers outreach, risk-based supervision, effective investigation and information gathering and international cooperation, and warns against applying the measures to the whole sector.
Where programmes usually fall short: All NPOs treated as high risk; Measures that de-risk or discourage legitimate activity
Source: FATF 40 Recommendations
AUSTRAC AMLCTF-PartA-TxnMon Transaction MonitoringSystems and controls for monitoring customer transactions for unusual or suspicious activity.
Where programmes usually fall short: No transaction monitoring
Source: Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act (Australia)